Hockey » English » ManagerZone talk

League Balance news

By dowopado - 15-06-2017 20:30

[BotP]

Your thoughts and comments regarding the league balancing as proposed in the news?Your thoughts and comments regarding the league balancing as proposed in the news?

 

Page 1

 

Reply

Last Message

Re: League Balance news

By floodish - 16-06-2017 02:58

[BotP]

Options A or B in my opinionOptions A or B in my opinion

Re: League Balance news

By jovanotti - 16-06-2017 03:41

B. I don't like to change league all the time. One Season you are second, first gets promoted and you think chances are good for the next one. Then you get moved and end up having no chance anymore (world league).B. I don't like to change league all the time. One Season you are second, first gets promoted and you think chances are good for the next one. Then you get moved and end up having no chance anymore (world league).

Re: League Balance news

By dowopado - 16-06-2017 05:53

[BotP]

If A. is the option that gets the most votes, I would like to see Crew modify it to do the rebalancing every 3 seasons rather than every season.If A. is the option that gets the most votes, I would like to see Crew modify it to do the rebalancing every 3 seasons rather than every season.

Re: League Balance news

By rooney4smoking - 16-06-2017 23:36

Option A for me personally.Option A for me personally.

Re: League Balance news

By coner08 - 17-06-2017 00:57

I don't think anything any option is good here. but if I have to choose one here it would be option D. The better way I think is to shuffle every four seasons (app. 1 year). That way there is some rivalry going on. But also it would allow any division get too strongI don't think anything any option is good here. but if I have to choose one here it would be option D. The better way I think is to shuffle every four seasons (app. 1 year). That way there is some rivalry going on. But also it would allow any division get too strong

Re: League Balance news

By deleted_5240478 - 17-06-2017 09:10

Option B for me! However, include teams that reached the playoffs in the shuffle. The core of each division stays the same aka 6 teams with 3 new promoted 1 relegated and 2 playoff losers making up the 12.Option B for me!
However, include teams that reached the playoffs in the shuffle.
The core of each division stays the same aka 6 teams with 3 new promoted 1 relegated and 2 playoff losers making up the 12.

Re: League Balance news

By agapitod (HMA) - 17-06-2017 13:40

[France]

I think for World League, the option A is great. We always play against different teams and it's fun. For official leagues though, it'd be better if they did rebalancing every 3 months like Bob said. Domestic leagues have more rivalries and if we change every season, I'm afraid we'll lose that.I think for World League, the option A is great. We always play against different teams and it's fun. For official leagues though, it'd be better if they did rebalancing every 3 months like Bob said. Domestic leagues have more rivalries and if we change every season, I'm afraid we'll lose that.

Re: League Balance news

By mobi_dicky - 17-06-2017 14:23

[PSCF]

In case, at the end of each season !! yes, i agree!!

agapitod wrote:

I think for World League, the option A is great. We always play against different teams and it's fun. For official leagues though, it'd be better if they did rebalancing every 3 months like Bob said.

In case, at the end of each season !!

yes, i agree!!

Re: League Balance news

By crholmes - 17-06-2017 19:33

option Aoption A

 

Page 1